Breast-conserving surgery (BCS) shows no difference in survival rates compared with total mastectomy. So, BCS is considered standard breast surgery with modified radical mastectomy. But in patients who received BCS, there is a risk of local recurrence in their long term follow up periods. Especially, BCS of young age is controversial regarding oncologic safety because of local recurrence. In this study, we struggle to confirm the oncologic safety of BCS compared with total mastectomy under the age of 35 in South Korea.
All patients who underwent surgery for breast cancer were 5,366 at Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System, from January 1981 to April 2008. Of them, patients younger than 35 years old were 547. We excluded patients who received chemotherapy before surgery and included only stage 1 and 2 patients who identified through the pathology after surgery. Finally, we got 367 patients; total mastectomy was performed in 245 and BCS, in 122. We compared clinicopathological characteristics and oncologic outcomes between two groups using SPSS program.
In patients received BCS, a local recurrence rate was 7.7% at 5 years and up to 20.3% at 10 years. In patients received total mastectomy, a local recurrence rate was 1.9% over 10 years (P<0.001). However, there was no difference in 5-year and 10-year overall survival rates between two groups (P=0.689). Adjuvant chemotherapy decreased local recurrence rate in BCS patients (P=0.019).
So, we concluded that BCS under the age of 35 has oncologic safety with undergoing chemotherapy.
Breast conserving surgery has been shown by numerous prospective studies to have the same survival rate as total mastectomy, and has currently taken a position alongside modified radical mastectomy as the standard surgical procedure for breast cancer [
Positive margins are a major risk factor for local recurrence after breast conserving surgery. Typically, total mastectomy is conducted when negative margins cannot be achieved after numerous resections [
Meanwhile, the standards for classifying patients as young have varied across studies, with some considering patients under 50 to be young, and others considering those under 35 to be young. A recent study on the appropriate age range to be considered young, conducted among patients registered in the Korean Breast Cancer Registration Program, concluded that 35 and below is the appropriate boundary [
From January 1981 to April 2008, a total of 5,366 patients underwent surgery due to invasive breast cancer at the surgery department of the College of Medicine of Yonsei University. Of these patients, 547 patients were aged 35 and below. The research was conducted only on patients with pathologically confirmed stage 1 or 2 breast cancer, and excluded patients who received chemotherapy prior to surgery or had cancer in both breasts. Of the remaining 371 patients, 1 was excluded due to the absence of records regarding the surgical method, and another 3 were excluded because they had not received radiation treatment. This resulted in a final total of 367 patients, 245 of whom had undergone a total mastectomy, while the remaining 122 had undergone breast conserving surgery. Factors such as the age at the time of diagnosis, histologic subtype, size of the tumor, axillary lymph node metastasis, staging, histologic grade, hormone receptor status, surgical method, margin status, whether radiation treatment was performed, whether chemotherapy was administered after surgery, and whether endocrine therapy was administered were recorded.
Simple local recurrence was defined as a recurrence in the chest wall, including the skin, in the area of the operation for total mastectomy, and was defined as recurrence in the skin and/or breast on the side of the operation for BCS. Recurrence in only the regional lymph nodes was excluded. The time until simple local recurrence was calculated as the time between the day of operation to the day of recurrence. Simple local recurrence was limited to recurrence in the breast that was operated upon. Hence, cases where regional or systemic recurrence occurred either first or simultaneously were excluded. In such cases, observation was ceased on the day that recurrence was discovered in a different area. Local or whole-body recurrence within 6 months of recurrence in the operated breast was treated as simultaneous recurrence. Systemic recurrence was defined as recurrence in an area beyond the operated breast and the regional lymph nodes. The systemic recurrence free survival period extended from the day of the operation to the day on which systemic recurrence was verified, and observations were ceased on the date of death or on the date of the final hospital visit. The total survival period was defined as extending from the date of surgery to the date of death, regardless of the cause. The final progress observation date was fixed at March 31, 2011. This research was conducted under the approval of the Severance Hospital Institutional Review Board (Approval no. 4-2016-1162).
The 2 patient groups were compared with the independent t-test for continuous variables, and the chi-square test for categorical variables. The survival curve was obtained using the Kaplan-Meier method, and the 2 patient groups were compared using the logrank test. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to verify that the surgical method was an independent prognostic factor. All statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS ver. 13.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA), and P-values from the 2-sided test less than or equal to 0.05 were considered to indicate statistical significance.
In 13 patients, isolated local recurrence took place after BCS; of these patients, recurrence was diagnosed in 3 within 2 years of surgery, in another 2 from 2 to 5 years after surgery, in 3 from 5 to 10 years after surgery, and in 4 after 10 years. The patients continued to be diagnosed with isolated local recurrence throughout the observation period. In contrast, only 4 patients who received total mastectomy were diagnosed with isolated local recurrence, and in all 4, recurrence was diagnosed within 3 years. The 2 patients who had positive margins in breast conserving surgery did not experience local recurrence during the observation period.
The isolated local recurrence rate in the patients who received BCS was 7.7% within 5 years and 20.3% within 10 years, both of which were higher than the corresponding rates in the patients who underwent total mastectomy (P< 0.001), who had an isolated local recurrence of 1.9% for both 5 and 10 years (
The isolated local recurrence rate in the patients who underwent breast conserving surgery and received chemotherapy was 5% within 5 years and 10.6% within 10 years. Factors such as the age at the time of diagnosis, T and N staging, the presence of estrogen receptors, and whether endocrine therapy was applied did not affect the isolated local recurrence rate. However, the surgical method did affect the isolated local recurrence rate (P< 0.028), even after correcting for age at the time of diagnosis and T staging (
The 5-year overall survival rate for the patients who underwent breast conserving surgery was 85.7%, while the 10-year overall survival rate was 87.1%. Meanwhile, the patients who underwent total mastectomy had a 5-year overall survival rate of 87.1% and a 10-year overall survival rate of 78.2%. The overall survival rate did not significantly differ between the 2 groups (P=0.689) (
Surgery for breast cancer is gradually developing from radical surgery to advanced surgical procedures that allow for oncological safety and improve quality of life. Hence, BCS for breast cancer surgery has become more common, and sentinel lymph node biopsy is also slowly becoming the standard for axillary lymph node surgery. Although there have been conflicting reports regarding whether patients who undergo a total mastectomy have a higher quality of life than those who undergo BCS, studies conducting long-term observations have established that patients who undergo BCS tend to have a higher quality of life [
To summarize the results of this study, although the isolated local recurrence rate was higher in the patients who underwent BCS than in those who underwent a total mastectomy, there were no differences in the overall survival rate, and chemotherapy lowered the isolated local recurrence rate in the patients who underwent BCS. This research only observed isolated local recurrences that were not systemic. The reason for this is that if both systemic metastasis and local recurrence occur simultaneously, the systemic metastasis typically determines the prognosis; hence, the prognosis of the local recurrence under such circumstances lacks clinical meaning.
There was a clear difference in the isolated local recurrence rate between the patients who underwent BCS and those who underwent a total mastectomy. Of the 5 patients who received BCS, 1 patient experienced recurrence in the breast that was operated upon within 10 years of surgery (under the age of 45) and required additional treatment. If isolated local recurrence influences the survival rate, BCS in patients under the age of 35 could be considered dangerous. However, although the patients who underwent BCS had a higher isolated local recurrence rate in this study, the overall survival rate did not differ between the 2 groups. It is possible that the number of patients and the observation period were both insufficient to verify differences in the total survival rate. However, a study that compared the 10-year survival rate in a much larger patient sample likewise reported no differences in the overall survival rate, despite differences in the local recurrence rate [
Although some studies have reported that systemic metastasis increased as the isolated local recurrence rate increased, those studies failed to verify the causality between isolated local recurrence and systemic metastasis [
According to the findings of the present study, adjuvant chemotherapy was effective in reducing the isolated local recurrence rate. This effect has also been verified in other studies [
However, this study is limited in that it is a retrospective analysis that only analyzed patients who received long-term treatment at a single facility. Furthermore, there were differences in the tracking period between the patients who received BCS and the patients who received total mastectomy, and detailed analyses including the medication used for chemotherapy were not conducted, despite developments in breast cancer treatment that could have distorted the results due to changes in the adjuvant treatments. Furthermore, this study did not analyze certain other factors that could have affected the overall survival rate, such as characteristics of the recurrent tumors and local and systemic treatment after recurrence. Hence, follow-up research that overcomes the limitations of this study is required.
For breast cancer patients under the age of 35, the likelihood of isolated local recurrence after BCS is much higher than that after total mastectomy. Although there is no need to prohibit BCS just because the patient is under the age of 35, chemotherapy based on the age at the time of diagnosis and the risk level of recurrence should be considered to reduce the possibility of isolated local recurrence. In order to produce accurate guidelines on the oncological safety of BCS in breast cancer patients under the age of 35, further research exploring the clinical significance of isolated local recurrence for the prognosis is required.
No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.
This research was funded by the National Health Insurance Service Ilsan Hospital.
(A) Isolated local recurrence-free survival and (B) overall survival curves according to local treatment in patients aged ≤35 years. BCS, breast-conserving surgery.
Isolated local recurrence-free survival curve according to the administration of chemotherapy in patients aged ≤35 years.
Characteristics of patients aged 35 years or younger undergoing breast conserving surgery (BCS) or mastectomy
Characteristic | BCS (n = 122) | Mastectomy (n = 245) | P-value |
---|---|---|---|
Age (yr) | 0.323 | ||
≤ 30 | 43 (35.2) | 72 (30.1) | |
> 30 | 79 (64.8) | 167 (69.9) | |
Tumor size (pT) | 0.005 | ||
T1 | 67 (54.9) | 97 (39.6) | |
T2 | 55 (45.1) | 148 (60.4) | |
Nodal status (pN) | 0.086 | ||
0 | 90 (73.8) | 159 (64.9) | |
1–3 | 32 (26.2) | 86 (35.1) | |
Grade | 0.356 | ||
1, 2 | 56 (62.9) | 95 (68.8) | |
3 | 33 (37.1) | 43(31.2) | |
Unknown | 33 | 107 | |
Estrogen receptor | 0.028 | ||
Negative | 57 (54.8) | 66 (41.0) | |
Positive | 47 (45.2) | 95 (59.0) | |
Unknown | 18 | 84 | |
Chemotherapy | 0.41 | ||
Done | 94 (77.0) | 193 (80.8) | |
Not done | 28 (23.0) | 46 (19.2) | |
Unknown | 0 | 6 | |
Endocrine therapy | 0.364 | ||
Done | 40 (32.8) | 87 (37.7) | |
Not done | 82 (67.2) | 144 (62.3) | |
Unknown | 0 | 14 | |
Adjuvant systemic therapy | 0.303 | ||
Done | 99 (81.1) | 204 (85.4) | |
Not done | 23(18.9) | 35 (14.6) | |
Unknown | 0 | 6 | |
Radiotherapy | < 0.001 | ||
Yes | 122 (100.0) | 16 (7.0) | |
No | 0 (0.0) | 213 (93.0) | |
Unknown | 0 | 16 |
Values are presented as number (%).
Univariate analysis of isolated LR for breast cancer patients aged 35 years or less
Characteristic | No. | 5-yr LR rate (standard error) | 10-yr LR rate (standard error) | P-value |
---|---|---|---|---|
Age | 0.63 | |||
≤ 30 yr | 115 | 3.0 (1.7) | 5.5 (3.0) | |
> 30 yr | 246 | 3.9 (1.5) | 8.1 (3.5) | |
pT stage | 0.176 | |||
I | 164 | 4.9 (2.1) | 10.4 (4.5) | |
II | 203 | 2.5 (1.2) | 4.0 (1.9) | |
pN stage | 0.549 | |||
I | 249 | 3.7 (1.4) | 8.4 (3.1) | |
II | 118 | 3.2 (1.9) | 3.2 (1.9) | |
Grade | 0.21 | |||
1, 2 | 151 | 5.7 (2.1) | 8.0 (3.1) | |
3 | 76 | 0 | 7.7 (7.4) | |
Estrogen receptor | 0.585 | |||
Negative | 123 | 4.7 (2.6) | 8.6 (4.5) | |
Positive | 142 | 5.4 (2.2) | 7.8 (3.2) | |
Operation method | < 0.001 | |||
Mastectomy | 245 | 1.9 (0.9) | 1.9 (0.9) | |
BCS | 122 | 7.7 (3.2) | 20.3 (7.7) | |
Adjuvant chemotherapy | 0.05 | |||
Not done | 74 | 5.1 (3.0) | 12.2 (5.6) | |
Done | 287 | 3.1 (1.2) | 4.3 (1.7) | |
Adjuvant endocrine therapy | 0.975 | |||
Not done | 226 | 3.4 (1.4) | 8.0 (3.0) | |
Done | 127 | 4.1 (2.0) | 4.1 (2.0) |
LR, local recurrence; pT, pathologic T stage; pN, pathologic N stage; BCS, breast conservaing surgery.
Multivariate analysis of isolated local recurrence for breast cancer patients aged 35 years or less
Characteristic | Relative risk (confidence interval) | P-value |
---|---|---|
Age (≤ 30 yr vs. > 30 yr) | 0.996 (0.342–2.897) | 0.993 |
T stage (I vs. II) | 1.295 (0.445–3.769) | 0.636 |
Operation method (mastectomy vs. BCS) | 0.114 (0.035–0.366) | < 0.001 |
Adjuvant chemotherapy (not done vs. done) | 2.090 (0.732–5.969) | 0.168 |
BCS, breast conservaing surgery.
Multivariate analysis of isolated local recurrence for breast cancer patients aged 35 years or less who had breast conserving treatment
Characteristic | Relative risk (confidence interval) | P-value |
---|---|---|
Age (≤ 30 yr vs. > 30 yr) | 1.847 (0.503–6.787) | 0.356 |
T stage (I vs. II) | 0.812 (0.198–3.319) | 0.771 |
Adjuvant chemotherapy (not done vs. done) | 4.802 (1.186–19.439) | 0.028 |
Multivariate analysis of overall survival for breast cancer patients aged 35 years or less
Characteristic | Relative risk (confidence interval) | P-value |
---|---|---|
Age (≤ 30 yr vs. > 30 yr) | 1.800 (1.035–3.130) | 0.037 |
T stage (I vs. II) | 0.700 (0.387–1.266) | 0.238 |
N stage (I vs. II) | 0.318 (0.177–0.573) | < 0.001 |
Operation method (mastectomy vs. BCS) | 1.040 (0.552–1.961) | 0.902 |
Adjuvant chemotherapy (not done vs. done) | 1.532 (0.737–3.183) | 0.253 |
BCS, breast conservaing surgery.